Network Topologies, Communication Protocols, and Standards

Every network has a topology that determines the way in which different devices of the network are arranged and how they communicate with each other. Here we need to distinguish between physical and logical topologies. The former refers to the physical layout of the network, i.e., the way that devices are physically connected to the network, either through actual cables or direct wireless communication links. By contrast, the logical topology of a network refers to the manner that data flows through the network from one node to the other without worrying about the physical interconnection of the devices for transporting a packet from a source to a destination device. The two lower layers of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) reference model (ISO/IEC international standard, Information technology – open systems interconnection – basic reference model: the basic model, 2nd edn, 1994) , the physical and data link layer, define the physical topology of a network, while the network layer is responsible for the logical topology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic €32.70 /Month

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

eBook EUR 93.08 Price includes VAT (France)

Softcover Book EUR 116.04 Price includes VAT (France)

Hardcover Book EUR 116.04 Price includes VAT (France)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

Networked Systems

Chapter © 2014

Networked Systems

Chapter © 2015

Networked Systems

Chapter © 2021

References

  1. ISO/IEC 7498-1, ISO/IEC international standard, Information technology - open systems interconnection - basic reference model: the basic model, 2nd edition, http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/s020269_ISO_IEC_7498-1_1994(E).zip, 1994.
  2. IEEE 11073-00101, Health Informatics—Point-of-Care Medical Device Communication—Technical Report—Guidelines for the Use of RF Wireless Technologies, Draft, October 2005. Google Scholar
  3. Philips Medical Systems. Striving for cableless monitoring. In: Ragil C (eds), Philips Medical Perspective Magazine 2005, 8:24–25. Google Scholar
  4. Falck T, Espina J, Ebert JP, Dietterle D. BASUMA-the sixth sense for chronically ill patients. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, Cambridge, USA, 2006. Google Scholar
  5. The MobiHealth project, http://www.mobihealth.org/
  6. The HealthService24 project, http://www.healthservice24.com/
  7. Lo BPL, Yang GZ. Key technical challenges and current implementations of body sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, 2005, 1–5. Google Scholar
  8. Anliker U, Ward JA, Lukowicz P, Tröster G, Dolveck F, Baer M, et al. AMON: a wearable multiparameter medical monitoring and alert system, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 2004, 8(4): 415–427. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Malan D, Fulford-Jones T, Welsh M, Moulton S. Codeblue: an ad hoc sensor network infrastructure for emergency medical care. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, 2004, 55–58. Google Scholar
  10. MyHeart project, http://www.hitech-projects.com/euprojects/myheart/
  11. Jovanov E, Milenkovic A, Otto C, de Groen PC. A wireless body area network of intelligent motion sensors for computer assisted physical rehabilitation. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2005, 2(1): 6. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Eklund JM, Hansen TR, Sprinkle J, Sastry S. Information technology for assisted living at home: building a wireless infrastructure for assisted living. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2005. Google Scholar
  13. Stanford V. Using pervasive computing to deliver elder care. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2002, 1(1): 10–13. ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. The Wear-a-BAN project, www.wearaban.eu, 2012.
  15. Kumar S. Nilsen W. Pavel M., Srivastava M. Mobile Health: Revolutionizing Healthcare Through Transdisciplinary Research. IEEE Computer Magazine 2013, 46(1): 28–35. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ganti R. K., Jayachandran P., Abdelzaher T. F., Stankovic J. A. SATIRE: a software architecture for smart AtTIRE. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, ACM, 2006, 110–123. Google Scholar
  17. Lorincz K., Chen, B.-R., Challen G. W., Chowdhury A. R.; Patel S., Bonato P., Welsh M.. Mercury: a wearable sensor network platform for high-fidelity motion analysis. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, ACM, 2009, 183–196. Google Scholar
  18. Espina J, Falck T, Mühlsteff J, Jin Y, Adán MA, Aubert X. Wearable body sensor network towards continuous cuff-less blood pressure monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Summer School and Symposium on Medical Devices and Biosensors, 2008. Google Scholar
  19. Lorincz K., Malan D.J., Fulford-Jones T.R.F., Nawoj A., Clavel A., Shnayder V., Mainland G., Welsh M., Moulton S., Sensor networks for emergency response: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2004, 3(4): 16–23. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen B. -R., Muniswamy-Reddy K. -K., Welsh M. Ad hoc multicast routing on resource-limited sensor nodes. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Multi-hop Ad Hoc Networks: from Theory to Reality, ACM, 2006, 87–94. Google Scholar
  21. Baldus H, Klabunde K, Müsch G. Reliable set-up of medical body-sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks, Berlin, Germany, 2004; Springer LNCS 2920:353–363. Google Scholar
  22. Falck T, Baldus H, Espina J, Klabunde K. Plug’n play simplicity for wireless medical body sensors. Mobile Networks and Applications 12(2–3), 143–153. Google Scholar
  23. Lorincz K, Welsh M. MoteTrack: A robust, decentralized approach to RF-based location tracking. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Location- and Context-Awareness, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, 2005; Springer LNCS 3479:63–82. Google Scholar
  24. Philips Research. Philips demonstrates new personal healthcare techniques, Press release, http://www.research.philips.com/newscenter/archive/2005/050623-aachen-healthcare.html, June 2005.
  25. The SAPHE project, http://ubimon.doc.ic.ac.uk/saphe/m338.html, 2008.
  26. Wood A., Stankovic J., Virone G., Selavo L., Zhimin H., Qiuhua C., Thao D., Yafeng W., Lei F., Stoleru, R. Context-aware wireless sensor networks for assisted living and residential monitoring. IEEE Network 2008, 22(4): 26–33. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Tia G., Pesto C., Selavo L., Yin C., Jeong G. K.; Jong H. L., Terzis A., Watt A., Jeng J. Bor-rong C., Lorincz K., Welsh M. Wireless Medical Sensor Networks in Emergency Response: Implementation and Pilot Results. In: Proceedings of the 2008 I.E. Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security 2008,187–192. Google Scholar
  28. Atallah L., Lo B., Yang G-Z., Siegemund F. Wirelessly accessible sensor populations (WASP) for elderly care monitoring. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 2008 (Pervasive Health 2008), 2–7. Google Scholar
  29. Chakravorty R. A programmable service architecture for mobile medical care. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2006. (PerCom2006), pp.5.–536. Google Scholar
  30. Ko J, Lim J. H., Chen Y., Musvaloiu-E R., Terzis A., Masson G. M., Gao T., Destler W., Selavo L., Dutton, R. P. MEDiSN: Medical emergency detection in sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Embedded. Computing Systems 2010, 10(1): 11:1–11:29. Google Scholar
  31. Gnawali O., Fonseca R., Jamieson K., Moss D., Levis P. Collection tree protocol. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 2009, 1–14. Google Scholar
  32. The AID-N Project, http://www.jhuapl.edu/aid-n/ (Final Report), 2007.
  33. The Independent Regulator and Competition Authority for the UK Communications Industries (Ofcom), www.ofcom.org.uk.
  34. Federal Communication Commission, http://www.fcc.gov/
  35. International Telecommunication Union. 2012. Radio Regulations. http://www.itu.int/pub/R-REG-RR
  36. ERC/REC 70-03, European Radiocommunications Office. ERC recommendation related to the use of short range devices (SRD):http://www.erodocdb.dk/docs/doc98/official/pdf/rec7003e.pdf, May 2013.
  37. IEEE 802.11. 2012. IEEE Standard for Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications. IEEE, March 2012. Google Scholar
  38. IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks--Part 15.4: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs). IEEE Std 802.15.4-2011 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2006), 1–314, 2011. Google Scholar
  39. IEEE 802.11a. IEEE Standard for Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems - LAN/MAN Specific Requirements - Part 11: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications: High Speed Physical Layer in the 5 GHz band. IEEE, January 1999. Google Scholar
  40. Takahashi D. Tzero Technologies shuts down; That’s the End of Ultra-Wide Band. 2009 http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/12/tzero-technologies-shuts-down-thats-the-end-of-ultrawideband/.
  41. ETSI EN 301 839. 2009. Electromagnetic compatibility and Radio spectrum Matters (ERM); Short Range Devices (SRD); Ultra Low Power Active Medical Implants (ULP-AMI) and Peripherals (ULP-AMI-P) operating in the frequency range 402 MHz to 405 MHz. ETSI. http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/301800_301899/30183901/01.03.01_60/en_30183901v010301p.pdf.
  42. Federal Communication Commission (FCC). 1999. 47 CFR 95.601–95.673 Subpart E.: http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=operations&id=medical_implant.
  43. Federal Communication Commission (FCC). 2012. Medical Device Radiocommunications Service (MedRadio). http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/medical-device-radiocommunications-service-medradio.
  44. Federal Communication Commission (FCC). 2012. FCC 12-54. Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to Provide Spectrum for the Operation of Medical Body Area Networks. First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.pdf
  45. ETSI TR 101 557. 2012. System Reference document (SRdoc); Medical Body Area Network Systems (MBANSs). http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/101500_101599/101557/01.01.01_60/tr_101557v010101p.pdf.
  46. Federal Communication Commission (FCC). 2012. Wireless Medical Telemetry Service (WMTS). http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/wireless-medical-telemetry-service-wmts.
  47. The IEEE 802.11™ Wireless Local Area Networks. The working group for WLAN Standards. http://www.ieee802.org/11/.
  48. The IEEE 802.15™ Wireless Local Area Networks. The working group for WPAN Standards. http://www.ieee802.org/15/.
  49. IEEE 802.15™. IEEE standard for information technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – Local and metropolitan area networks – Specific requirements – Part 15.1: wireless medium access control and physical layer specifications for wireless personal area networks. 2002. Google Scholar
  50. IEEE 802.15 ™. IEEE Standard for Information Technology - Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems - Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Specific Requirements. - Part 15.1: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs). IEEE Std 802.15.1-2005 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.1-2002), 1–580, 2005. Google Scholar
  51. Bluetooth SIG™. Bluetooth Core Version 4.0. 2010. https://www.bluetooth.org/Technical/Specifications/adopted.htm.
  52. IEEE 802. 15 ™. IEEE Recommended Practice for Information Technology - Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems - Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Specific Requirements Part 15.2: Coexistence of Wireless Personal Area Networks With Other Wireless Devices Operating in Unlicensed Frequency Bands. IEEE Std 802.15.2-2003, 1–115, 2003. Google Scholar
  53. IEEE 802.15 ™. IEEE Standard for Information Technology - Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems – Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Specific Requirements Part 15.3: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for High Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs). IEEE Std 802.15.3-2003, 1–315, 2003. Google Scholar
  54. IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Standard for IEEE Amendment to Part 15.3: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for High Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPAN): Amendment to MAC sublayer. IEEE Std 802.15.3b-2005 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.15.3-2003, 1–169, 2006. Google Scholar
  55. IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Standard for Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements. Part 15.3: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for High Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Amendment 2: Millimeter-wave-based Alternative Physical Layer Extension. IEEE Std 802.15.3c-2009 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.15.3-2003), 1–187, 2009. Google Scholar
  56. IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks—Part 15.4: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs) Amendment 4: Alternative Physical Layer Extension to Support Medical Body Area Network (MBAN) Services Operating in the 2360 MHz – 2400 MHz Band, 2013. Google Scholar
  57. IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Recommended Practice for Information technology-Telecommunications and information exchange between systems-Local and metropolitan area networks-Specific requirements Part 15.5: Mesh Topology Capability in Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs). IEEE Std 802.15.5-2009, 1–166, 2009. Google Scholar
  58. IEEE 802.15™. IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks - Part 15.6: Wireless Body Area Networks. IEEE Std 802.15.6-2012, 1–271, 2012. Google Scholar
  59. Dwola F. Handbook of RF and Wireless Technologies. Newens, 2003. ISBN-13 978-0-7506-7695-3. Google Scholar
  60. Popovski P., Yomo H.; Prasad R. Strategies for adaptive frequency hopping in the unlicensed bands. IEEE Wireless Communications, 13(6): 60–67. Google Scholar
  61. Bluegiga, www.bluegiga.com.
  62. Nordic Semiconductors. Bluetooth Low Energy. http://www.nordicsemi.com.
  63. Texas Instruments, Single-Chip 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 Compliant and ZigBee™ Ready RF Transceiver, http://www.ti.com/product/cc2420.
  64. The ZigBee Alliance, http://www.zigbee.org/.
  65. The ZigBee 2012 Specification. http://www.zigbee.org/Specifications/ZigBee/Overview.aspx.
  66. The ZigBee Healthcare Profile. http://www.zigbee.org/Standards/ZigBeeHealthCare/Overview.aspx.
  67. Arora S., Barak B. Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach. Chap. 19. Cambridge University Press, 2009. ISBN-13 978-0521424264. Google Scholar
  68. Golmie N, Cypher D, Rebala O. Performance analysis of low rate wireless technologies for medical applications. Computer Communications 2005; 28(10):1 255–1275. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Jennic Wireless Microcontrollers. Co-existence of IEEE 802.15.4 at 2.4 GHz. Application Note, 2009. Google Scholar
  70. Pollin S., Tan I., Hodge B., Chun C., Bahai A. Harmful Coexistence Between 802.15.4 and 802.11: A Measurement-based Study. In: Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CrownCom 2008) 2008, 1–6. Google Scholar
  71. LaSorte N.J., Rajab S.A., Refai H.H. Experimental assessment of wireless coexistence for 802.15.4 in the presence of 802.11g/n. In: Proceedings of the 2012 I.E. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC2012) 2012, 473–479. Google Scholar
  72. IEEE 802.15™. Coexistence analysis of IEEE Std 802.15.4 with other IEEE standards and proposed standards. Technical Report, 2010. http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/19/pub/CA/15-10-0808-00-0000-802-15-4-2011-coexistence-analysis.pdf
  73. IEEE 802.15™. TG6 Coexistence Assurance Document. Technical Report, 2011. https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/documents.
  74. Hernandez M., Miura R., Coexistence of IEEE Std 802.15.6TM-2012 UWB-PHY with other UWB systems. In: Proceedings of 2012 I.E. International Conference on Ultra-Wideband (ICUWB2012) 2012, 46–50. Google Scholar
  75. Garcia J.J., Falck T. Quality of Service for IEEE 802.15.4-based Wireless Body Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 2009. Google Scholar
  76. HL7 – Health Level 7, http://www.hl7.org/.
  77. DICOM – Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine, http://medical.nema.org/
  78. Schmitt L, Falck T, Wartena F, Simons D. Novel ISO/IEEE 11073 Standards for Personal Telehealth Systems Interoperability. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Workshop on High Confidence Medical Devices, Software, and Systems and Medical Device Plug-and-Play Interoperability. 2007; pp. 146–148. Google Scholar
  79. ISO/IEEE 11073-20601. 2010. Health informatics—Personal health device communication—Application profile—Optimised Exchange Protocol. Google Scholar
  80. ISO/IEEE 11073-10101. 2004. Health informatics – Point-of-care medical device communication – Part 10101: Nomenclature. Google Scholar
  81. ISO/IEEE 11073-10404. 2008. Health informatics – Personal health device communication—Part 10404: Device specialization— Pulse oximeter. Google Scholar
  82. Continua Health Alliance, http://www.continuaalliance.org/index.html.
  83. Continua Health Alliance. Continua Design Guidelines, version 2012. Google Scholar
  84. NFC Forum, http://nfc-forum.org/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philips Group Innovation, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands Javier Espina, Thomas Falck, Lars Schmitt & Oliver Mülhens
  2. The Hamlyn Centre, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK Athanasia Panousopoulou
  3. The Hamlyn Centre, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2BY, UK Guang-Zhong Yang PhD
  1. Javier Espina